From the monthly archives:
There are certainly two camps on how to interpret the constitution. There is the conservative literal interpretation and then there is the more liberal activist idea of interpretation. Kagan certainly falls into the latter despite her refusal to acknowledge that she understands what the term ‘legal progressive’ means (yesterday’s hearing). Even if all you have [...]
{ Comments on this entry are closed }
The confirmation hearing for Elena Kagan began yesterday. I have written a couple of posts on her and my belief that she should not be confirmed. Here is one. And the Second. You are welcome to read those posts again as they are pretty revealing, but if you do not want to you here is [...]
{ Comments on this entry are closed }
Last Friday the House passed the DISCLOSE act, an unconstitutional piece of legislation created at the request of the President to bypass the Supreme Court’s ruling in the Citizens United Case. It is one of the few things Congress is doing instead of passing a budget. For those not following it, here is a summary [...]
{ Comments on this entry are closed }
Lets take a walk through history. “The United States in Congress assembled … recommend this edition of the Bible to the inhabitants of the United States … a neat edition of the Holy Scriptures for the use of schools.” - United States Congress 1782 (after having 20,000 copies printed for the people) “The Congress of the United States [...]
{ Comments on this entry are closed }
The Heritage Foundation has just launched a sister organization, Heritage Action for America. The Heritage Foundation is one of the most influential think tanks in the country and one that provides critical research to those in Washington. This new organization is designed as an activist organization that will give the people more power to influence [...]
{ Comments on this entry are closed }