“I mean up until this recent crisis, as recently as March, when I was calling for a fundamental overhaul of the regulatory system on Wall Street, Senator McCain was saying I’m basically a deregulator.”
You often hear misleading comments such as the one above from Barack Obama. He, of course, was the last person in Congress that would want to regulate Fannie and Freddie as it was in fact the Republicans to include John McCain that have been trying to do this over the last decade. For those nay-sayers here it is straight from President Clinton’s mouth last week.
“I think the responsibility that the Democrats have may rest more in resisting any efforts by Republicans in the Congress, or by me when I was President, to put some standards and tighten up a little on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.”
I can list quote after quote from Barney Frank, Christopher Dodd, Senator Schumer, and Jack Reed telling their fellow congressmen, the American people, President Bush and even Alan Greenspan that there was no problem and that they didn’t know what they were talking about. Here is a good list to start you off if you want to call my bluff.
There are also members of Barack Obama’s campaign that were directly involved with this scandal to include Franklin Raines and Jim Johnson. But this is just icing on the cake because all these connections only show Barack Obama’s lack of judgment. The real connection should be that the policies that got us into this mess are something that Obama has been pushing for his entire political career. His acknowledged work for ACORN and his support for their cause link him directly to this crisis. Here is an article from the NY Post describing ACORN and Obama.
ACORN uses unprofessional tactics to try to pressure both the government and banks to make these risky loans to people who should not be able to afford them. And they have been fairly successful. It is the root cause of this entire crisis. Obama has shown his support of this group and their tactics by working directly for them, representing them as a lawyer and funding them through the Woods Fund, the Joyce Foundation, and the Chicago Annenberg Challenge.
The scariest part is that Congressional Democrats tried to include a provision in the recent defeated bailout package that would give 20 percent of any profits the feds make from reselling mortgage securities back to groups like ACORN. What about giving the profits back to the taxpayer who footed the bill in the first place. I guess the Democrats have still not learned the lesson they should have from this crisis.






{ 5 comments… read them below or add one }
tsc,
the us senate came to the rescue. after responsible reps & dems in the house defeated the bailout bill, the senate just had to come to the rescue. let me tell you something, the senate was bribed. that’s right, bribed. here are some facts:
sen. chris dodd
received $105,400 from goldman sachs
received $527,444 from other major banks
sen. mitch mcconell
goldman sachs $17,500
banks $163,300
sen harry reid
goldman sachs $6,000
banks $99,200
sen joe biden
goldman sachs $14,800
banks $143,650
sen. barak obama
goldman sachs $691,930
banks $2,102,643
sen. john mccain
goldman sachs $208,395
banks $1,890,574
do not believe the senate did this for main street. they took bribes from wall street for this very purpose. the bailout/rescue will not work. they will be asking for more money in 3 months & we will be much poorer due to the inflation tax.
vote for third party candidates for us senate. vote half these law breakers out of office.
Greg,
It is true they take money from lobbyists and as I have said before as long as there is legislation that will affect these companies, lobbyists will exist to bring their point of view to the politicians.
The money you describe is taken over time so your statement that they took bribes for this particular legislation is a little extreme.
This particular legislation was eventually passed after the provisions were negotiated, which your candidate would never do. He does not work with others.
It was not popular, but then again the average American does not understand the ramifications if nothing was done. The people it will most benefit will be those whose retirements were protected. If nothing was done, it could lead to numerous other problems that I do not have time to list now.
tsc,
Come on my man. Do you really believe this package bailout will work. Credit is what got us in this mess. Do you think the Fed or the Treasury has 1.29 trillion dollars in a vault somewhere. We are bankrupt, all we can do is issue debt to others countries. Heck, we issue debt to pay off the interest on money we borrow. No my friend you are wrong on this one. We are heading for a drastic deflationary period that may just slip us into a depression. All created by a fiat money system & a special interest pandering posture of the government. When will the American people learn that it is the two party system that has created this mess. We need more choices & it looks like those choices are going to come the hard way.
I guess when you mention my candidate you are referring to Dr Ron Paul. He is not a candidate, but I wish he was. He is the only Congressman on the Hill that has gotten this crisis correct. Please study up a bit on Austrian Economics. The Keynsian theory of creating credit does not work. Eventually the people in power abuse the priveledge of printing money. It gets out of hand and the currency collapses. That is what is happening & Bush, Paulson & Bernanke’s answer is to print more money. My advise to you and you readers is to prepare your families for the coming crisis. You haven’t seen anything yet & we are 1.29 trillion poorer. By the way, they will be asking for more money soon!
Greg,
I was talking about Ron Paul since I know you are a supporter. I do have hope that this bailout will lessen the effect of this current crisis and I hope our government officials, the American people, and these corporations have learned a lesson about greed so it will not happen in the future.
Although I have not had time to study up much on this topic because of work, I know that the people working on this are much smarter than me.
I also do not believe that the two party system has anything to do with this crisis. I am sure there are positives and negatives for both systems. People are people so I am sure we could figure out a way to screw both up…lol.
By the way, do you have a site with pros and cons of both systems…or maybe one defending each I would be willing to look them over when I get time. If you do please shoot me an email.
I guess in the end I don’t care that much about money, its man made and we can do with it what we will…my reward is elsewhere.
you are absolutely correct. phillipians 4:6-7
thank you tsc
greg